Research and innovation culture
The University Ethics Policy [PDF] provides a general framework for professional practice and decision making on ethical issues as they arise in the work of the University.
The University Ethics Committee (UEC) is responsible for ensuring that appropriate consideration is given to ethical issues relating to the main activities of the University, including Research, Teaching and Innovation.
The University has adopted the UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO) Code of Practice for research as its own, and we publish an annual statement [PDF] outlining our compliance with the Universities UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity. You can also read more about the University's other research governance procedures.
Ethics Review (Instructions for Staff and Research Students)
Researchers and research managers/supervisors should ensure they've taken into account the responsibilities summarised in the University's Research & Innovation Project Governance Responsibilities – one of which is ensuring an appropriate ethics review is conducted.
To find the most appropriate form of ethics review, researchers can first use the Ethics Screening Tool.
If you think your project may require an external ethics review, please read the following information.
Submission of Proposals to External Ethics Committees
For some research proposals, an application to an external ethics committee may be required, and any application to an external ethics committee must receive sponsor sign-off from the University.
To arrange this you must notify your Faculty Ethics Committee of your intention so that any necessary advice and support can be provided. This will normally involve assurance from your head of department that the work will be conducted in accordance with the UKRIO code of practice for research.
The most obvious example of work requiring external review is any research involving NHS patients, relatives and carers, or NHS data. Ethics review forms part of the wider HRA Approvals process. Researchers must apply for HRA approval using the IRAS system.
There are also some other types of research that do not require the HRA Approvals process, but must still be reviewed by an NHS REC as a matter of law. This includes research involving human tissue, adults lacking capacity, Clinical Trials of Investigative Medicinal Products (CTIMPs), trials of medical devices, and human participant research involving ionising radiation. We advise using this online decision tool. Please note, applications must again be made through IRAS.
Research requiring access to prisoners or prison staff must be authorised by Her Majesty's Prisoner & Probation Service prior to review by a Faculty Ethics Committee.
Please note, it's University policy that only one formal ethics review should take place. If the review must be conducted by an NHS REC or MODREC then their opinion will suffice for University purposes.
If the external body states that a review by them is not required, an application must be made to your Faculty Ethics Committee instead. For example: it is possible to get HRA approval without the ethics component of the approval, in which case a faculty ethics review is required.
For further guidance please contact your faculty ethics chair or the University Ethics Advisor.
NHS Research Passports
If you're either a member of staff or research student at the University, and are proposing to carry out research in the NHS – and have no ongoing contractual relationship with the NHS – you will need a Research Passport. For further guidance, please contact the University's HR department.
Human Tissue Research
If your research involves working with human tissue, you need to ensure you comply fully with the law. Guidance for Human Tissue Research is available to assist in this process.
Any queries regarding human tissue research should be directed to Dr Simon Kolstoe, University Ethics Advisor (email@example.com)
If the ethics screening tool directs you to a Faculty Ethics Committee review (or you already know that this is required), please download the application form with guidance and submit it to the relevant faculty from the dropdown menu below.
Find all the important forms, templates and documents you need in the following list:
- Participation Information Sheet
- Participant Invitation Template
- Peer Review Template
- Consent Form Template
- Further Advice on GDPR compliant wording
- GDPR Consent factsheet
- Guidance on Equality and Diversity in Research Populations
- Guidance on Research in your own place of work and/or other situations where there is a potential conflict of interest
- Guidance on Security Sensitive Research
- Guidance on Designing and Conducting Surveys
- Creative and Cultural Industries | Ethicsfirstname.lastname@example.org | CCI FEthC Terms of Reference
- Humanities and Social Sciences | Ethicsemail@example.com | HSS FEthC Terms of Reference
- Faculty of Business and Law | Ethicsfirstname.lastname@example.org | BAL FEthC Terms of reference
- Science & Health | Ethicsemail@example.com | Science FEthC terms of reference
- Technology | Ethicsfirstname.lastname@example.org | Technology FEthC Terms of reference
To notify a Faculty Ethics Committee of a substantial amendment please download our 'Notice of Substantial Amendment' form. To notify a Faculty Ethics Committee of the end of a study, please download our 'End of Study' form.
Dr Simon Kolstoe (email@example.com) is the University Ethics Advisor and is the first point of contact for research ethics issues arising in Central Services and Support Departments.
University of Portsmouth Research & Innovation Project Governance Responsibilities
Appropriate governance of research and innovation activities is mandated by all research and higher education funders. It is also required by professional and learned societies. Responsibility for governance (including when research or innovation activities are conducted for educational purposes) lies initially with the member of staff responsible for the project/student followed by their department/school head, followed by dean of faculty, and ultimately PVC research.
The following list is not exhaustive as there may be additional requirements for specific types of research (such as clinical trials), but at the minimum those responsible should ensure:
1. The project is justified and the primary and secondary outcomes are appropriately designed.
2. Everyone who will be involved in the project is appropriately qualified by education, training and/or experience to discharge their roles and responsibilities in the project.
3. The project has been appropriately peer reviewed.
4. Plans are in place for a suitable ethics review of the project and this will be completed prior to any work being undertaken.
5. Appropriate dissemination and engagement activities have been considered and (if required) an impact plan is in place.
6. All health and safety risk assessments and considerations have been made and/or taken into account.
7. All amendments, annual and final reports, will be submitted to the appropriate authorities if required.
8. All relevant laws and professional guidance are being followed.
University of Portsmouth specific:
9. The aims of the project, and the organisation(s) we want to work with, are consistent with the University's mission and values.
10. Any relevant project initiation forms have been completed.
11. All external support and collaborations comply with the University’s financial policies and procedures. This includes due diligence checks where necessary.
12. Data will be managed in accordance with the University Data Management Policy, and where appropriate a data management plan will be put in place.
13. The scope of the proposed project falls within the University’s insurance and indemnity policies.
14. All required declarations of interest have been made and will comply with the University’s research integrity and misconduct policies.
15. The University’s intellectual property policies has been consulted and appropriate discussions/ arrangements have been made as required.
16. All required contracts and/or agreements will be in place prior to starting the project.
17. Arrangements are in place for the project team to access resources and support to deliver the work as proposed.
18. Approval to conduct the project has been gained from the relevant department head(s)/deans(s).
Read the important policies and procedures from external bodies.
- RCUK Policy and Guidelines on the Governance of Good Research Conduct, 2013
- Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care
- UKRIO Code of Practice for Researchers
- Universities UK: The Concordat to support Research Integrity
- NHS Research Ethics Service (RES)
- Her Majesties Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) research guidance
- British Sociological Association's Digital Research Ethical Guidance
- Market Research Society Code of Conduct
- Social Media Research: a guide to ethics
- The Social Research Association Ethics guidelines [PDF]
- Socio-Legal Studies Association Statement of Principles of Ethical Research Practice [PDF]
- Involving Disabled People in Social Research [PDF]
- UK data service legal & ethics guidance
- British Educational Research Association Ethics Guidance
- EU PRO-RES Ethics Framework (for Research in the Humanities & Social Sciences)
Read research ethics and governance guidance from a selection of external bodies.
- UKRI Policies on research integrity
- ESRC guidance
- UKRI policies and advice for engaging the Public with Research
- AHRC report providing ethical guidance on community based collaborative research
- MRC Research Ethics and Integrity
- NERC Ethics Policy
- STFC Ethics Policy
- Generic Faculty Ethics Committee Terms of Reference
- Research Ethics Subcommittee Terms of Reference
- Validation checklist for submission to a faculty ethics committee
- Standard Operating Procedures for the review of a full application
- Standard Operating Procedures for the review of an amendment
- Further Information letter template
- Favourable opinion letter template
- Unfavourable opinion letter template
- Role descriptor for Ethics Chair
- Role descriptor for Vice Chair
- Role descriptor for Staff Member
- Role descriptor for Lay Member
- Role descriptor for Student Member
- Role descriptor for Administrative Officer
- Guidance document for calculating workload allocations
Dr Simon Kolstoe (firstname.lastname@example.org) is the University Ethics Advisor.
Professor Bob Nichol (email@example.com) is our Pro Vice-Chancellor for Research and Innovation – please contact him if you have any concerns relating to Research Integrity at the University.
If you have any questions regarding Research Governance at the University of Portsmouth, you should contact Denise Teasdale (firstname.lastname@example.org), Research Manager in Research and Innovation Services.
To report a matter relating to research misconduct or make a complaint using the University’s Whistleblowing Policy, please contact Adrian Parry (email@example.com), the University's Director of Corporate Governance.